<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping Up Appearances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ethicalstyle.com/issue-11/the-illusionists/keeping-up-appearances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ethicalstyle.com</link>
	<description>Fashion. Sense.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethical Style &#187; Should Surgically-Enhanced Models Not Do Lingerie Ads?</title>
		<link>http://ethicalstyle.com/issue-11/the-illusionists/keeping-up-appearances/comment-page-1/#comment-7937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethical Style &#187; Should Surgically-Enhanced Models Not Do Lingerie Ads?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ethicalstyle.com/?page_id=4842#comment-7937</guid>
		<description>[...] reminds us of the controversy over using false eyelashes in mascara commercials, an issue over which a Rimmel ad was banned in 2007. But let&#8217;s open it up to the commenters: Do you feel inadequate when looking at lingerie ads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reminds us of the controversy over using false eyelashes in mascara commercials, an issue over which a Rimmel ad was banned in 2007. But let&#8217;s open it up to the commenters: Do you feel inadequate when looking at lingerie ads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
